The State of the Art in Agent Communication Languages

Reference: Kone, Shimazu, Nakajima (2000). Knowledge and Information Systems, Springer. Source file: The_State_of_the_Art_in_Agent_Communication_Langua.pdf. URL

Summary

A critical review of ACL design circa 2000. The authors lay out a generalized ACL framework structured around eight principles (heterogeneity, cooperation/coordination, separation, interoperability, transparency, extensibility/scalability, performance, and security). They distill ACL specifications into four components: message format, semantic model, interaction protocols, and shared ontologies/content language.

The paper surveys major ACLs — KQML with KIF and facilitator mediation, France Telecom’s ARCOL with its rational-action semantics, the FIPA standard derived from ARCOL, OAA’s ICL, and mobile-agent LOGOS — documenting each approach’s advantages and limitations (lack of formal semantics, low heterogeneity, missing shared ontologies, weak negotiation protocols). It closes by identifying open issues and pointing to the social-agency approach of Singh as a promising direction.

Key Ideas

  • Eight ACL design principles as evaluation yardstick.
  • Four-part ACL spec: format, semantics, protocols, ontology.
  • KQML vs. ARCOL/FIPA as declarative approaches; OAA/LOGOS as procedural.
  • Speech-act-derived communicative act categories.
  • Key open issues: formal semantics, heterogeneity, shared ontologies.

Connections

Conceptual Contribution

Tags

#acl #survey #kqml #fipa #arcol

Backlinks